SC stays plea against ‘arbitrary’ toll tax
- David Headley connects the dots: Hafiz Saeed, ISI, failed Mumbai attacks
- David Headley: Travelled to India 8 times, changed name for passport
- Rs 1.14 lakh crore of bad debts: The great government bank write-off
- Caste came up in 3 suicide probes at Hyderabad University
- Uttar Pradesh has been turned into 'Islamic state': Sena mouthpiece on Ghulam Ali concert
The Supreme Court Friday stayed proceedings on a petition against the Centre, states and the National Highway Authority of India for tolling four-wheelers even after the cost of a road is recovered.
The PIL, filed by Justice R S Verma and two others, is in the Rajasthan High Court. The high court has sought explanation from the Centre, the Rajasthan government and the NHAI as to why toll plazas were set up and toll rates fixed in an arbitrary manner.
It has also asked them to explain why NHAI provides a huge concession period of 20 to 30 years for charging a high rate of toll — that too without an assessment of whether such a concession is required — though cost of a project is usually recovered in 3 to 7 years.
In their PIL, the petitioners said, "It is beyond our comprehension as to how an additional tax in the name of 'toll tax' could be imposed when there is already a cess besides road tax and other prevailing taxes like service tax, income tax etc for the same purpose."
- We have turned our back to the intense food and drinking water distress
- Strategies anchored in incubators fail to foster entrepreneurship
- Existing regime of film censorship is unconstitutional
- Section 377: A right to love
- PM Oli has been lucky, but his political survival looks uncertain
- Across the aisle- MGNREGA: Making a meal of words