SC verdict on homosexuality retrograde: Jairam Ramesh

JairamJairam Ramesh's statement came as the government indicated that it would take the legislative route to deal with the issue.

Union Minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday termed as "retrograde" the Supreme Court verdict that upheld a law criminalising homosexuality and wondered why it is a crime if two consenting men and two consenting women share physical relations.

"Personally, I think it is a retrograde judgement and it has done no justice to a modern liberal India. If two consenting men and two consenting women...why should be illegal," Ramesh said reacting to the apex court verdict.

"It is choice issue, personal choice. It is a liberal society, a modern society, a society that gives choice to individuals," the Rural Development Minister said.

His statement came as the government indicated that it would take the legislative route to deal with the issue.

The apex court in its verdict put the ball in Parliament's court to decide on the desirability of deleting the relevant section from Indian Penal Code.

Ramesh said he supported the Delhi High Court's verdict which had in 2009 decriminalised gay sex among consenting adults in private.

"I thought A P Shah was on the right track," he said.

A two-member bench of the High Court comprising Justice A P Shah and Justice S Muralidhar had decriminalised gay sex as provided in Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and had ruled that sex between two consenting adults in private would not be an offence.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus