SEC charges Indian brokerages, including Edelweiss, Ambit for unauthorised dealings
- With Air Force flypast, Republic Day parade concludes at Rajpath
- Republic Day celebrations pass off peacefully in Kashmir
- India, France talk tough on terror, stuck on Rafale price
- Continue to complain, rebel, demand, President Pranab Mukherjee tells nation
- Tamil Nadu suicides: College owner turns herself in
US market regulator SEC has charged four Indian brokerages - Ambit Capital, Edelweiss, JM Financial and Motilal Oswal - for providing unauthorised broking services here, but agreed to settle the charges after
a payment of more than $1.8 million (about Rs 10 crore).
Besides, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is further probing the role of other companies, which may include some from India, for potential violation of similar nature.
The SEC said in a statement late last night that the four financial services firms were providing brokerage services to institutional investors in the US without being registered with the SEC as required under the federal securities laws.
"The four firms - Ambit Capital Private Limited, Edelweiss Financial Services Limited, JM Financial Institutional Securities Private Limited, and Motilal Oswal
Securities Limited - agreed to pay more than USD 1.8 million combined to settle the SEC's charges," the regulator said.
Despite being unregistered broker-dealers, the four companies engaged the US investors here through sponsored conferences, regular travel of their employees to meet the US investors, traded securities of India-based issuers on behalf of US clients and participated in securities offerings from India-based issuers to US investors, SEC said.
In their respective settlements, the firms agreed to be censured while neither admitting nor denying the SEC's charges. Ambit agreed to pay disgorgement and prejudgement interest totalling USD 30,910, Edelweiss agreed to pay USD 568,347, JM Financial USD 443,545 and Motilal Oswal Securities agreeing to pay USD 821,594.
The SEC said that the companies' "cooperation with the Commission staff and their prompt remedial measures", besides their initiating registration with the SEC as a broker-dealer, were "important factors in accepting the firms' settlement offers, particularly the Commission's decision not to impose a cease-and-desist order or a penalty."
The regulator said it "is continuing to look for potential violations at other firms".
- It is clear PM’s concept of nationhood extends beyond constitutional parameters
- Minority status for AMU?
- What we do with Parliament building will powerfully signify who we are, how we view our past, where we see ourselves going
- AIR’s decision to share its rich archives through an online radio station is welcome
- Asset sales are the way for govt to protect credibility while avoiding procyclical fiscal stance
- Who killed Rohith Vemula?