SEC charges Indian brokerages, including Edelweiss, Ambit for unauthorised dealings
- Bihar polls: Jitan Ram Manjhi announces alliance with BJP
- NSCN-K plans revenge attack; high alert sounded across Northeast
- Pak Senate slams Modi's remarks, passes resolution
- Parrikar says those who 'fear India's new posture' have started reacting
- Airtel calls it ‘standard solution’, but experts say 'spy code' is illegal
US market regulator SEC has charged four Indian brokerages - Ambit Capital, Edelweiss, JM Financial and Motilal Oswal - for providing unauthorised broking services here, but agreed to settle the charges after
a payment of more than $1.8 million (about Rs 10 crore).
Besides, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is further probing the role of other companies, which may include some from India, for potential violation of similar nature.
The SEC said in a statement late last night that the four financial services firms were providing brokerage services to institutional investors in the US without being registered with the SEC as required under the federal securities laws.
"The four firms - Ambit Capital Private Limited, Edelweiss Financial Services Limited, JM Financial Institutional Securities Private Limited, and Motilal Oswal
Securities Limited - agreed to pay more than USD 1.8 million combined to settle the SEC's charges," the regulator said.
Despite being unregistered broker-dealers, the four companies engaged the US investors here through sponsored conferences, regular travel of their employees to meet the US investors, traded securities of India-based issuers on behalf of US clients and participated in securities offerings from India-based issuers to US investors, SEC said.
In their respective settlements, the firms agreed to be censured while neither admitting nor denying the SEC's charges. Ambit agreed to pay disgorgement and prejudgement interest totalling USD 30,910, Edelweiss agreed to pay USD 568,347, JM Financial USD 443,545 and Motilal Oswal Securities agreeing to pay USD 821,594.
The SEC said that the companies' "cooperation with the Commission staff and their prompt remedial measures", besides their initiating registration with the SEC as a broker-dealer, were "important factors in accepting the firms' settlement offers, particularly the Commission's decision not to impose a cease-and-desist order or a penalty."
The regulator said it "is continuing to look for potential violations at other firms".