Section 377 verdict today: LGBT community pins hopes on SC
- Lok Sabha proceedings washed out as Opposition adamant on Sushma Swaraj, Vasundhra Raje's resignation
- BJP counters Congress with ‘sting CD’ on Uttarakhand CM’s aide
- Nitish Kumar to welcome PM Modi, attend programmes too if invited
- Speaker Sumitra Mahajan's warning of 'disciplinary action' irks opposition
- Lt Governor Najeeb Jung calls DCW chief's appointment illegal
Members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community all over India have their fingers crossed as the Supreme Court is scheduled to give its verdict on Section 377 of the IPC on Wednesday.
Section 377, which criminalises "unnatural offences", had been declared unconstitutional by the Delhi High Court in 2009. However, the decision was later challenged in the Supreme Court.
The community hopes the apex court will uphold the HC verdict and decriminalise homosexual relationship between two consenting adults.
LGBT activists had termed the Delhi High Court's decision as a "historic first" in India in their effort to fight for their rights. "Now, we are waiting with bated breath and keeping our fingers crossed for the SC verdict," Ashok Row Kavi, a prominent LGBT rights activist, told The Indian Express.
Row Kavi is believed to be the first person to openly talk about homosexuality and gay rights in India. His first 'coming out' interview appeared way back in 1986.
"The judgment will be extremely important and the mood really is quite expectant," said Row Kavi, adding that the momentum had been building for several years now.
Petitioners, including NAZ Foundation, parents of LGBT persons and others, had challenged the constitutional validity of Section 377. The verdict will decide the legality of homosexuality.
"Our level of excitement is unbelievable," said Bidhumadhav Khire, president of the Sampathik Trust that works with men who have sex with men in the city. Khire's mother Shakuntala is among the petitioners who feels the SC verdict will be an important one as it will give a direction on how the future laws will evolve. "If it (the SC) is not in favour, my gay son will not get the respect that a first class citizen commands," she said.