Setting up a self-goal
- Indonesian military plane crash death toll rises to 74
- Eurogroup turned down Greek bailout extension, says Finnish FinMin Alexander Stubb
- Disappointment creeping in over Modi govt's reform pace: Moody's
- Dholpur Palace: Congress' fresh document says it's a govt property
- Greece will not pay IMF debt on Tuesday: Finance minister
Dredging up PoK could disrupt gains in the bilateral engagement, constrict space for Pak leadership
Of all the ways in which the UPA undercuts its own foreign policy, this one is special. A proposal being seriously considered by the home ministry — as reported in this paper — envisions reserving seats in Parliament for legislators from Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. This would take an amendment to Article 81 of the Constitution. It would follow the principle already being observed in the Jammu and Kashmir assembly, where 24 out of 111 seats are meant for PoK members, and are kept empty — apparently as a symbolic claim to the territory occupied by Pakistan. It is also a wrongheaded idea, one that dredges up bilateral issues that remain unresolved but which have receded in urgency, opening up spaces for bilateral engagement. In the present context, it could damage any progress that two successive Indian prime ministers have sought to make with Pakistan.
It is no secret that India and Pakistan have looking-glass versions of the Kashmir issue and that there has been no closure, in spite of the disputes being raked up over and over again. A parliamentary resolution in February 1994 placed on record India's position on Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. But these contending claims over Kashmir, which consumed the relationship between India and Pakistan in the past, blocking movement on all other fronts, have receded from the dialogue in recent times, and no longer figure in international assessments of the region, which is to India's advantage. To make aggressive gestures on Kashmir now is not only to needlessly renew hostility, but also to constrict space for Pakistan's political leadership in the most counter-productive way.