This moment calls for sobriety and restraint. Don't let a jingoistic clamour endanger India-Pakistan dialogue
Even as the new Pakistan government seeks to resume the dialogue with India, and Prime Ministers Manmohan Singh and Nawaz Sharif prepare to meet next month, the ambush and killing of five Indian soldiers, allegedly by Pakistani troops and terrorists at the Line of Control, threatens to place great strain on a delicately poised relationship. Lok Sabha was adjourned for the day on Tuesday, but not before opposition parties tore into the government for what they termed as its failure to stand up to Pakistan. The Samajwadi Party poured scorn on the "bechara" defence minister, and the BJP demanded to know whether the UPA was on India's side or Pakistan's. It suggested that all talks with Pakistan cease if even one bullet is fired on the border.
This kind of belligerent boilerplate about "fitting replies" to "dastardly acts" is evidently the opposition's attempt to present itself as the strong-willed alternative. Sections of the TV commentariat, too, have used these individual incidents to cast quick and irresponsible judgement on the larger peace process. The UPA has weakly buckled before this din in the past. After the incident of killing and mutilation at the LoC this January, the prime minister went so far as to say that "business-as-usual" was unsustainable. Instead of publicly articulating and explaining why it is necessary to protect and insulate the bilateral talks, the government tried to match a rising jingoistic clamour with its own fighting words. The animosity even bled into cultural and sports events. That sorry theatre was enacted all over again, after Sarabjit Singh's killing in May. This time, hopefully, the government will maintain a sense of proportion. The composite and integrated dialogue is crucial and remains the one lever it has, given Pakistan's complicated internal and external situation.