SIT opposes Zakia Jafri's petition on clean chit to Narendra Modi in Gujarat riots
- Kerala: Sale and consumption of alcohol in five-star hotels only, rules Supreme Court
- Govt to increase maternity leave in pvt sector from 12 to 26 weeks
- Girl alleges gang rape by Army men onboard Howrah-Amritsar Express
- Report on Dadri meat ready for 2 months, police yet to collect it
- No LPG subsidy for taxpayers who earn over Rs 10 lakh annually: Government
The Special Investigation Team (SIT) today strongly contested the protest petition filed by Zakia Jafri against its closure report giving clean chit to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and others in the 2002 post-Godhra riot case.
The day-to-day hearing on the petition filed by Zakia earlier this month, began in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate B J Ganatra today.
In a three-point rebuttal, the SIT, represented by its counsel R S Jamuar, sought to discard the very FIR filed by Zakia in 2006, claiming "the way it (FIR) has been drafted suggests that it's nothing but a piece of waste paper."
Zakia, wife of 2002 post-Godhra riots victim and former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri who was killed in the Gulbarg Society riots, along with 68 others, had filed the complaint with Supreme Court on June 8, 2006 against Narendra Modi and 58 others.
Zakia demanded rejection of the closure report filed by the Supreme Court-appointed SIT on February 8, 2012, giving clean chit to Modi and others, and requested filing of chargesheet against them.
"In comparison to the complaint as defined in Criminal Procedure Code(CrPC), this (the FIR) is not at all a complaint, it's a piece of waste paper to be thrown away," said Jamuar.
"It's a fiction or novel written by 4-5 persons and complainant Zakia has no knowledge about anything written in it," he argued.
Zakia has also demanded further investigations into the case by an independent agency other than the SIT, headed by former CBI director R K Raghavan.
Raising the second point of objection, Jamuar cited the content of Zakia's complaint, claiming "the complainant has presented no case, no evidence..but extracted the material which was submitted before Justice (retired) G T Nanavati-Akshay Mehta Commission".
"The complainant has extracted most of the material submitted, examined and cross-examined by a commission of inquiry, Justice Nanavati Commission, which is still functioning and yet to submit its final report," Jamuar said.
- Akhand Bharat, is misread as a political programme of party or government
- India-Pakistan relations cannot be treated as the personal property
- Chennai must look beyond the flood relief spectacle
- Raja-Mandala: Modi’s Pakistan opportunity
- Arun Jaitley is the Manmohan Singh of the BJP
- Iran may transform from an insular security state to a regional power