Snooping: Pradeep Sharma lodges complaint, but cops refuse to register FIR against Modi

The state government had set up an inquiry commission on November 26, after it came under attack over the alleged surveillance of the woman by Opposition parties and civil society organisations. The commission -- comprising retired Gujarat High Court judge Sugnya K Bhatt (who is heading it) and former Additional Chief Secretary K C Kapoor--- has been asked to submit its report within three months. On December 26, the Centre had decided to set up another inquiry commission as the incidents of physical and electronic surveillance had occurred in Himachal Pradesh and Delhi, allegedly without authorisation.

Sharma told reporters outside the police station, "The commission of inquiry and police investigations are two different things. First, they would have to register a complaint of criminal offence and conduct investigation based on it. The findings of the investigations carried out by the commission will be placed in the state Assembly."

Sharma had also filed a defamation suit against columnist-activist Madhu Kishwar in the scandal, alleging that she dragged his name in the row and tried to sully his image through comments on Twitter and on TV channels. In her tweets and during debates, Kishwar had alleged that the suspended bureaucrat was harassing the woman architect due to which her father asked for police protection. An IAS officer of the 1984 batch, Sharma has been facing six criminal cases in Gujarat. He has claimed he is being victimised by the state government for his knowledge of the "intimacy" shared by Modi with the woman architect, the subject of surveillance.

'Documents forged to intercept phones'

Ahmedabad: In his complaint (a copy of which is with this paper), Sharma wrote, "It is also clear that false documents were created and used in official and legal ways for ulterior reasons, in order to enable the interception of the telephones. In order to mount illegal telephonic surveillance on (name withheld) who was not an accused or wanted in any case, or for that matter on me, documents were forged to deceive service providers to intercept telephone conversations and provide the intercepted data to the accused, including the police officers involved, who used for private and illegal purposes the government equipment placed under their trust for legal interceptions of telephones. Moreover, the physical surveillance of the woman architect intruded her privacy. Furthermore, the accused persons disobeyed rule 419A of the Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951. These facts constitute a criminal offence under various sections of penal law." Besides Singhal, Sharma has made CBI deputy S P G Kalaimani (investigating officer of Ishrat Jahan case) as his witness.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus