Snoopping row: Gujarat govt says calls not tapped, police has CDRs
- Subrata Roy faces 'ink attack' outside SC, seeks more time to refund Sahara investors' money
- Nitin Gadkari-Raj Thackeray closeness could 'affect' alliance, hints Shiv Sena
- TRS wonât merge, Congress readies to walk alone in both Andhra and Bihar
- Tehelka rape case: Tarun Tejpal's bail plea hearing begins
- Smith announces sudden retirement, says fortunate to have had many highs
In response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) over the legality of appointment of Sugnya Bhatt inquiry commission and the alleged tapping of 93,000 phone calls the state government Thursday informed the Gujarat High Court that these calls were not tapped but are actually Call Data Records (CDRs) which were obtained by the state police for investigation purpose.
A division bench of Chief Justice Bhaskar Bhatacharya and Justice J B Pardiwala ordered the petitioner to file an affidavit with regards to his allegations that 93,000 phones were tapped. The petitioner Girish Das has sought Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry into these tapping.
Additional Advocate General Tushar Mehta informed the court that these CDRs were obtained by police for investigation purpose. However, Das argued that these CDRs were procured illegally and therefore it should be probed by CBI.
On May 8 Additional Director-General of Police (CID) Shivanand Jha, also commissioner of police Ahmedabad city, had issued a circular stating that only an investigating officer can obtain permission to procure CDR from police commissioner or Superintendent of Police in case of an offence. The reason, the circular had cited, was the number of CDRs being sought by cops as well as an instance in New Delhi in which a top politician's CDR was procured by a constable.
Besides CDRs, the petitioner has also challenged the legality of Sugnya Bhatt inquiry commission set up the state government to investigate snooping on a young woman by several police officers at the behest of BJP leader Amit Shah.
Das has claimed that section 3 of Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952, deals with constituting a panel for the purpose of inquiry into cases of public importance. However, investigating a single person's case can not be said to be done in public interest. Therefore, Das has claimed to allow CBI inquiry into the alleged CDRs obtained by state police.
- Russia tightens grip in Crimea, West threatens ‘consequences’
- Heavy patrolling in Sector 23 after thief leaves daring note
- Difference of opinion between Patil and UT’s senior standing counsel led to his resignation
- Commissioner to look into shady land deals in 35 villages: High Court
- Class X maths exam easy for some, tough for others
- Panchkula MC approves budget of Rs 39 crore