Speaker Meira Kumar rejects BJP, Left demand for separate debates on FDI, FEMA
- One year of AAP sarkar: Kejriwal announces cleaner water, better healthcare facilities
- JNU row: Meet the family of Kanhaiya who is a ‘danger to Mother India’
- Great as FM, reforms stopped after Manmohan Singh became PM: Jaitley
- Dial Kejriwal: Delhi Cabinet to take your calls today, 11 am onwards
- Sunanda Pushkar death probe: Tharoor questioned by Delhi Police for 5 hours
The demand for separate discussion and voting was raised by BJP leader Yashwant Sinha and supported by CPI-M leader Basudeb Acharia and Gurudas Dasgupta of CPI.
But, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath and Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde, who is Leader of the House, opposed the demand.
After considering the two views, the Speaker ruled that the debate on FDI and FEMA will be held together after which vote can take place separately tomorrow.
Informing that she had consulted Nath and Shinde, she said the two issues are related and "therefore to avoid repetition it was decided to have combined discussion ..."
Citing a rule, Sinha said debate and voting on FDI in retail under Rule 184 should not be clubbed with the one regarding modifications to FEMA notifications issued by the RBI in October.
He said members have right to move amendments to FEMA modifications up to 30 working days from the day it was tabled in Parliament and that right should not be taken away.
"I request, doing so (clubbing the two) is not proper," he said, demanding separate debate and vote.
He noted that the notification was tabled on November 30 and the 30-day period will not end even on December 20, the last of the current Winter Session.
Sinha said the FEMA issue can be carried forward and discussed in the Budget Session or even the Monsoon Session.
Two members - Saugata Roy (Trinamool) and Hasan Khan (Ind) - have moved amendments to FEMA notification.
Supporting Sinha, Basudeb Acharia (CPI-M) said there is enough time to debate and vote amendments in FEMA and hence the two should be separated.
However, Nath opposed the demand saying the two issues were related and because of this they have been clubbed.
"One subject cannot be discussed in three-four forms … Amendments can be moved even today if any member wants ... I don't know why there is confusion, I don't know why there is hesitation ... This (FEMA) also will be voted upon ... I don't know why they are running away from vote," he said.
He said opposition should "welcome" the vote as it was demanded by them. "Why are you hiding behind a rule to avoid a vote," he asked.
Murli Manohar Joshi (BJP) said clubbing the two issues was violation of the rights of a member to move amendments.
Dasgupta hit out Nath saying a minister should not shout.
"Parliamentary (Affairs) Minister should have wisdom that nobody is running away (from vote)...We are firm...I am sure you have been able to manoeuvre majority with your technology ... If you have manoeuvred majority here, we will fight you elsewhere," Gupta said.
Sinha too said that no one is running away from vote.
Referring to members' concerns about their right to move amendments to FEMA in 30 days, the Speaker said "the 30-day period is intact...it has not been taken away".
Noting that last one week of Parliament was lost in fight over Rule 184, Shinde said the House should go ahead with common debate and vote on the two related subjects. Sinha sought separation of the two issues citing a precedence of 1957 when discussion and debate were clubbed on mines and mineral bill but the Speaker ruled that the two situations were different and that example was not applicable in the present case.
Oppn attacks govt on FDI, wants rollback
Slamming the government for allowing FDI in retail, Opposition today asked it to withdraw the decision in national interest fearing it would render retailers jobless, impoverish farmers and hurt consumers.
Initiating the debate on the issue, Leader of the Opposition Sushma Swaraj contended that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, as Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha in 2002, had opposed FDI in retail and questioned as to what has changed that the government is so determined to implement it.
In her nearly 90-minute speech, punctuated by repeated disruptions and heated exchanges, Swaraj maintained that the concept of large supermarkets has failed in Western economies and wondered how the government was claiming it would create jobs in India.
She asserted that BJP was not opposed to FDI per se and as Leader of the Opposition she was willing to travel with the Prime Minister across the world to invite investments in other sectors like infrastructure. Singh was present when she spoke.
Appealing to parties like SP and BSP to support the motion moved by her and Khagen Das (CPI-M) against 51 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail, Swaraj said any defeat during vote will not bring down the government but will force it to rollback the decision on FDI.
"Your fear that the government will fall because of this vote is unfounded," she said turning to members of SP and BSP, which have so far maintained ambiguity over their stand on voting.
Pressing for rollback of the "disastrous" FDI decision, she told the government "hum aapko hara ke jeetna nahin chahte, hum aapko mana ke jeetna chahte (We don't want the rollback by defeating you. We want the rollback by convincing you)," she said.
Swaraj said the decision to allow FDI in retail was not a step towards development but a leap into a ditch of "destruction."
Referring to statements made by the government that FDI in retail would empower consumers, she said large superstores will wipe out small retailers by first dropping prices and then charging higher prices once there is no competition.
Swaraj also said claims that farmers will benefit from the move was "baseless" as the experience of the European Union shows that farmers are forced to sell their produce below production cost to large retail chains.
"A fool learns from his own experience, while a wise man learns from the experience of others," she said.
She claimed that the most likely scenario would be that retail chains would not buy products from small and medium farmers at all and supported her contention by giving the example of Pepsi in Punjab which rejected locally produced potatoes and tomatoes as being below standards.
She said even McDonalds was importing potatoes from abroad and not buying the produce locally.
"You are from the state which produces apples...a local whole-seller would take out a damaged apple and sell the consignment. But the bigger chains will reject the entire consignment. When people will come to your doorsteps with their grievances, you won't be able to help them," Swaraj told Commerce Minister Anand Sharma.
The BJP leader said even US President Barack Obama is supporting the 'small business Saturday' campaign by going to small shops to support their business. Swaraj used the debate to target Congress President Sonia Gandhi, who was present, on her statement that fastest pace of development has been witnessed by UPA-II government.
"Except for seven years, there had been Congress governments between 1952 and 2012...were you challenging the government headed by your mother-in-law (Indira Gandhi) or the one headed by your husband (Rajiv Gandhi)," she posed.
"Who were you referring to," Swaraj asked.
Gandhi shot back saying she was referring to "you" (BJP). She said when Priya Ranjan Dasmunshi was Congress Chief Whip during NDA rule, he had brought a Calling Attention Motion
terming "alleged" moves by the then government for FDI in retail as "anti-national".
She said as Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh had replied to a representative of a Maharashtra trade body that government has assured Parliament that there was no plan to bring FDI in retail.
"Pradhan Mantri ji, sonch kyon badal gayi? (Mr Prime Minister, what has prompted the change of mind)," she said in the presence of Singh, who did not respond.
During her speech, there were several occasions when opposition and treasury benches were involved in verbal duels, prompting leaders like Gandhi, L K Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi to calm tempers.
On one occasion, Leader of the House and Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde took objection to a BJP member "challenging" the Speaker.
Speaker Meira Kumar asked members not to get "over excited" while participating in the discussion.
Saugata Roy of TMC, who moved a motion to amend FEMA resolution allowing FDI in multi-brand retail, wanted to know why the government took important decisions concerning Indo-US civil nuclear deal and permitting FDI in multi-brand retail ahead of Presidential elections in the US.
Noting that Hillary Clinton was on the board of Walmart before joining the American government, he said, she was in India in May 2012 to make New Delhi agree to FDI in retail which would be beneficial for the US.
"Does the government of India have to respond to American urging?" Roy questioned.
His mention of the name of Clinton evoked sharp reaction from treasury benches with External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid objecting to the remarks and wanted the Speaker to expunge them. Kumar ruled she would go through the records and remove them.
Roy said Khurshid was worried on two names – positively for Clinton and negatively for Arvind Kejriwal.
In a rare coming together of political foes, Roy found support from CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta, who said, "Mr Khurshid is very much concerned about Mrs Clinton."
These remarks also evoked sharp reaction from Congress members including Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury who repeatedly shouted that TMC and CPI-M have come together.
"Are we selling our head for few pieces of sliver?", he said recalling words of Rabindranath Tagore who had described the decisive Battle of Plassey as sun set for Bengal.
"They (East India Company) came as traders and become Rajas. Is America coming through Walmart to capture Indian power", he asked.
Roy also said the government's decision to allow FDI in retail was based on two reports -- one by Planning Commission and the other by think-tank ICRIER. While the Plan panel is headed by Montek Singh Ahluwalia, ICRIER's chairperson is Isher Judge Ahluwalia, he said.
He also recalled that American cables leaked by Wikileaks did point out Clinton's keenness for appointment of Montek Singh Ahluwalia as Finance Minister instead of Pranab Mukherjee.
Cong flays move to put FDI in retail to parliamentary vote
As Parliament today began discussing FDI in retail under a rule entailing voting, Congress did not hide its displeasure over the "unhealthy precedent" that an executive decision has been put up for legislative vote.
"In principle, the issue has set an unhealthy precedent of putting an executive decision to vote by Parliament. There was nothing illegal or unconstitutional in the decision to bring FDI in multi-brand retail and the government agreed to discus the issue under 184 only to ensure smooth running of Parliament" party spokesperson P C Chacko told reporters here.
The party spokesperson also expressed confidence that the motion to disucss the issue under a rule that entails voting will see the Opposition's contention being rejected in both Houses.
"UPA is confident the motion will be rejected in both Houses. We are confident that both Houses will reject the resolution on FDI. We are hopeful this will also eventually discourage use of Parliament for political brinkmanship," Chacko said.
Slamming the Opposition for "not taking a principled stand on FDI" and being "hell bent to embarass the government at any cost", Chacko rued that when the government agreed to a vote on FDI, the Opposition demanded the same for FEMA notification.
When the government agreeed to put to vote both together, the same parties insisted for separate voting for each, he added.
Chacko also dismissed the charge that the assurance given by the then Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee of taking all stakeholders on board on FDI in retail was not honoured by the government.
"Government did not make any announcement suddenly.
Letters were written to 21 Chief Ministers. 11 of them supported the move. An effort was indeed made to build a consensus. There is absolutely no violation of the assurance given by the then Finance Minister to the House. We implemented that in word and spirit.
"But then is voting in Parliament the way to forge a consensus? Government did consult the parties," he said.