Speakerís judgement puts question mark on Bishnoi and his wifeís status
- Elections 2014 LIVE: Record 79 pc polling in Bengal; Jaswant Singh writes to EC against Raje
- Congress releases CD of Uma Bharti calling Narendra Modi 'Vinash Purush'
- Admiral Dhowan appointed as new Navy chief
- CAG empowered to examine accounts of private telecom companies: Supreme Court
- IPL 7 Live Cricket Score, DD vs RCB: RCB pick early wicket as Starc removes Mayank
While as per Speaker Kuldeep Sharma's order, HJC stands merged with the Congress, the question that now arises is which party Renuka Bishnoi ó wife HJC chief Kuldeep Bishnoi ó represents in the Assembly. Renuka was elected on a HJC ticket from Adampur after Kuldeep vacated the seat to contest from Hisar Lok Sabha constituency. In the Lok Sabha as well, Bishnoi is the sole HJC MP.
Satya Pal, Jain who represented Bishnoi in Speaker's court, said: "Renuka represents HJC. Five MLAs joining do not mean that the party has merged with the Congress."
"The BSP has only one member in the Assembly and hence, he is a complete unit of the BSP in the state. Can he merge the BSP with the Congress or any other party?" asked Jain, adding that next week, the HJC will move Punjab and Haryana High Court against the Speaker's order.
Four of the five defector MLAs had claimed that they met at Karnal where Bishnoi was dismissed from the party. The fifth joined the group next day.
The Speaker had said he accepted the merger under provisions of the 10th schedule of the Constitution, which allows such merger provided it was supported by two-third strength of the MLAs. As 75 of 108 primary members of the party decided to merge HJC with the Congress... "consequently, it is claimed that the HJC (BL) ceased to exist on November 8, 2009", he added.
The judgment gives a impression that lack of evidence and witnesses had cost Bishnoi. It stated, "The petitioner appeared as his sole witness in this case. He came in the witness box and then closed evidence... It is strange that at one stage, he refuses to disclose the agenda of the meeting and in next breath, says that it was to endorse the proceedings of a previous meeting... It proves he was a reluctant witness..."
Jain, however, said: "There was no reason for us to present witnesses. They were supposed to bring witnesses because they were to prove that any such meeting was held, which they could not."
- Activist, her aide booked for cheating in attempt to frame acquitted murder accused
- Extended Monorail running hours fails to pull crowd
- HC orders action against Essel World for causing harm to mangroves
- Cops crack bar girl’s murder case after waiter’s tip-off
- Railway to provide plastic pouches for commuter IDs
- Last safety check for Metro to begin April 18