Spy vs Spy
- Uttarakhand floor test fixed for May 10, nine disqualified MLAs not to take part: Supreme Court
- Bombay High Court upholds cow slaughter ban in Maharashtra, but decriminalises beef possession
- Sonia, Manmohan released after courting arrest during protest march
- Indiabulls sponsored Chhagan Bhujbal trust Rs 2.5 cr for festivals, got library contract: ACB
- Give us yearwise details of funds sent overseas by Indians listed in Panama Papers, RBI tells banks
Zee-Jindal case raises many questions; wait for word from the court
It's unnerving to find oneself on the same side as Subramanian Swamy and Arnab Goswami, watching Zee and Jindal Steel and Power Ltd play a weird variation of Spy vs Spy. Swamy wants to slash, burn and nuke his way through the miasma of absurd claims and innuendo surrounding the case. In particular, he suggests that the arrest of two Zee journalists was improper. Goswami's project is pitched lower, though, as usual, his voice is high: can a charge of extortion be countered with an appeal for the protection of media freedoms, he asks.
The media is willing to contemplate its navel and bewails the lint therein. It's had some practice. Rajdeep Sardesai speaks of a crisis of credibility and asks, "Is it easier to believe corporates than the media today?" It's been that way ever since Radiagate, when journalists were found to be playing along with — or "stringing along" — a publicist and lobbyist. Though no evidence of material benefit was produced, the charge of professional impropriety stuck. Meanwhile, paid news has been revealed to be a pervasive phenomenon — 190 cases have been detected in the Himachal Pradesh election, for instance — which has cast a shadow over the credibility of all news.
The Jindal sting is a complicated story whose details matter. Talking about a crisis of credibility in media suggests an expansion of ambit, but it is actually reductive because distance blurs detail. Here, while guilt or its absence remains to be determined by the courts, all the parties except the law have managed to compromise themselves. Just a little, in some absurd way or another.
JSPL has released only 15 minutes of footage from three rounds of negotiation and is clearly reluctant to reveal the rest, suggesting that it reveals something apart from extortion. Zee News claims to have been running a sting but, as Broadcast Editors' Association member Dibang said on Times Now, had no footage to prove it. Zee CEO Alok Agrawal riposted by making an incomprehensible distinction between a "sting operation", where evidence must be collected and "sting journalism", which apparently uses "another via media". Go figure. Go mad figuring.
- Punish the guilty of AgustaWestland, but also fix the weak links
- Clarity is needed on the supremacy of legislature, and its limits, in its own sphere
- A range of preventive and remedial steps must be taken in the hill forests of Uttarakhand
- If grief and anger unite us, so does, when such occasion arises, relief
- Dear Krishna Kumar, the AAP has unleashed a silent revolution in education
- Suffering of millions does not create public outrage, much less govt accountability