STF receives applications from former DGP Sreekumar, Shabnam Hashmi

"This is a policy and a well-considered decision of Chief Minister Narendra Modi," Sreekumar has quoted Rao as telling him at the meeting.

This is part of a register of verbal instructions that Sreekumar reportedly maintained in 2002 when he was ADGP (Intelligence).

One of the applicants has claimed that Sanjay alias Sanju Sharda Singh, who was killed in an encounter in south Gujarat, was one of the "informers" allegedly used by suspended IPS officer Abhay Chudasama. The other cases of this region include encounters of Himla Machchar and Mahesh Gadhwali.

Shabnam has alleged that the "investigations" by the STF are futile as Gujarat Police officers are its members, right from the chairman to field officers.

She has urged Justice Bedi to reconstitute the STF with police officers of "credibility and experience".

She has alleged that STF members are close to Modi and are posted in the Ahmedabad Crime Branch. This assumes significance as three of the encounters, including of Sameer Khan Pathan in 2003, involved Crime Branch officers.

"Justice Bedi will look into all these representations and allegations and then call the applicants at the monitoring authority's office in Gandhinagar to record their statements," said the STF member.

According to STF officials, most of the affected families did not reply to their summons, following which the police personally visited their houses and delivered the summons.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus