Supreme Court issues contempt notice to former Army chief V K Singh
- Malaysia signals missing plane carrying 239 including 5 Indians has crashed
- Disquiet in BJP as M M Joshi, Sushma raise questions over selected candidates and seat sharing
- Subrata Roy arrest row: The not-so-beautiful story
- Vajpayee wanted Modi to quit over Gujarat riots, but party said no: Venkaiah Naidu
- Rest in freeze: Is Ashutosh Maharaj 40-day âclinically deadâ or a guru in a very long meditation?
The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued a notice of criminal contempt to former Army Chief Gen V K Singh, demanding his explanation over his statements against the court verdict on his age row.
A bench of Justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale initiated suo motu contempt proceedings on the basis of a report published in The Indian Express on September 22, which reproduced Singh statements to news agency ANI.
In the contempt notice, the bench mentioned that Singh was said to have issued certain statements to ANI, which prima facie, scandalises or tends to scandalise this court.
It also lowers or tends to lower the authority of this court, which is criminal contempt of court under Article 129 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 2(C) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the bench said.
This court therefore takes cognizance of criminal contempt of court. Let a notice be issued to Gen V K Singh as to why proceedings be not initiated against him under the Contempt of Courts Act, it said.
The court also issued notice to this newspaper, saying Let a notice be also issued to the publisher of The Sunday Express for publishing the above statements of Gen V K Singh.
The bench fixed October 23 as the next date of hearing, and requested Attorney General G E Vahanvati to assist the court.
In its order, the bench noted the facts of how Gen V K Singh approached the apex court to get an order for treating his date of birth as May 10, 1951 and not as May 10, 1950. A favourable order from the court would have given him an extra year in office.
The bench recounted how Singh's counsel U U Lalit, after the matter was argued for some time in the court, had sought to withdraw the petition on the ground that Singh did not wish to pursue the case any further.