Teenage egg donor's death: 'No negligence on part of fertility clinic'

A committee of doctors from state-run JJ Hospital has concluded that there was no negligence on the part of 'Rotunda: The Centre for Human Reproduction' in a case pertaining to the death of 17-year-old Sushma Pandey, an egg donor. Sushma died on August 10, 2010, two days after she donated eggs at the hospital.

The opinion of the JJ Hospital committee was sought after the Bombay High Court discharged Sushma's employer Sunil Chaumal and asked the police to probe the role of the hospital in which she had donated eggs thrice "in flagrant violation of the requirement that such a donor has to be between the ages of 18 years and 35 years."

The committee's clean chit to Rotunda, informed to the court by the police Tuesday, brings relief to Dr Gautam Allahbadia, medical director of the centre. Allahbadia is also a member of the drafting committee of the Assisted Reproductive Technologies (Regulation) Bill, 2010, that is yet to be tabled in Parliament.

While hearing the application for discharge filed by Sanaullah Mustakin, the man who allegedly accompanied Sushma to the Rotunda Centre two days before she died, Justice Revati Mohite Dere said, "It appears that no action will be taken against the doctors." She, however, observed that the case was unfortunate and said, "This is something where not just one person is involved. The report (from JJ Hospital) does not stop them (police) from investigating who else is involved."

In its report of December 9, 2013, the committee — comprising Dr G D Niturkar and Dr G S Chavan from the Department of Forensic Medicine and Dr Tushar Palve from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology — stated that Sushma had died as a result of "brain hemorrhage and pulmonary hemorrhages due to ovarian hyper-stimulation shock syndrome."

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus