The costs of no food security
- Rajya Sabha ruckus: Digvijaya Singh raises objections over Goa Governor's conduct
- Income Tax department starts nationwide raids on petrol pump owners. Here's why
- Who is Trivendra Singh Rawat?
- MS Dhoni, other Jharkhand players evacuated after fire breaks out at Dwarka hotel
- Fadnavis moving to Modi cabinet? 'I'm a true soldier of the party,' he says
India is at the point where a low income democracy cannot afford to ignore the hungry
Is India's food security ordinance supportable? The debate has been vigorous. It will help to separate the questions of process from those of principle.
Whether an ambitious scheme of this magnitude should have been brought in as an executive ordinance or as a new law after parliamentary debate, is basically a procedural question. It is not unimportant, but it does not tell us whether food security is inherently desirable in India. Once we have probed desirability, it would make sense to ask whether food security is affordable, even if desirable. There is also the question of whether the Indian state has the capacity to implement an ambitious welfare programme. Lumping all of these issues together — process, desirability, affordability, implementability — muddies analytical waters.
But one might begin with a different issue altogether. It has been vociferously argued that the government has promulgated the food security ordinance to enhance its electoral prospects. It is unclear why that is an unworthy impulse. Democratic politics cannot easily be envisioned without the idea of winning power. Power is embraced in democratic politics, not shunned. Even a dying government thinks of rebirth. One's liking for or dislike of UPA 2 should be separated from one's judgement of food security. Few who were opposed to the NDA objected to Vajpayee's peace moves towards Pakistan or his road-building projects. The key analytical issue is whether good ideas are being married to the pursuit of power.
Moreover, the debate over legislative versus executive paths to welfare programmes seems rather misdirected, especially if Parliament does not fully function. Even otherwise, an ordinance will cease to exist if it does not receive parliamentary approval. Food security without legislative endorsement will be stillborn.
- Political parties question EVM. But when they win with the same machines, they don’t eat their words
- Amending the Motor Vehicles Act is the first step towards reducing accidents
- India, and the world, are changing. Our collective responsibility — to make politics and policy more creative — grows more urgent
- In the recent polls, PM Modi used social media in ways that flattened out the political terrain
- UP election results show people want development and corruption-free governance
- The triumphant narratives call for disciplining of Muslims, and for Hindu assertion