The name is Gandhi
- Patna High Court stays Nitish Kumar's election as JD(U) legislature party chief
- Arvind Kejriwal gets down to business, calls for full statehood for Delhi
- President Pranab Mukherjee warns against deviation from constitutional principles
- Sunanda Pushkar murder case: SIT to quiz Shashi Tharoor tomorrow
- Shanti Bhushan accuses Arvind Kejriwal of accepting 'tainted' money
Naming of government schemes after Congress's first family is crude advertising that belittles voters
The Congress leadership has evidently staked a lot of political capital in passing the Food Security Act. But just to make sure nobody misses that point, the party is considering renaming the central scheme under the act. It will be called either Indira Amma Anna Yojana or Indira Amma Bakshya Suraksha Yojana, according to Union Food Minister K.V. Thomas.
If this is accomplished, it will be the latest in a long and growing scroll of government welfare schemes named after one or the other member of the Nehru-Gandhi family. An RTI revealed that among Central schemes and institutions, 16 are named after Rajiv Gandhi, eight after Indira Gandhi and three after Jawaharlal Nehru. There are others who occasionally figure — Atal Bihari Vajpayee has one scheme named after him, Ambedkar was chosen for four others, post-'90s. But, by and large, the Congress's first family is all over schemes that touch the lives of citizens, from drinking water to rural electrification, from pensions to creches, from ambulances to sporting facilities, not to mention the many smaller missions and roads and trophies memorialising the family. This is replicated in Congress states as well. The calculation is clear — it is an attempt to brand a government scheme, make sure that the public is aware of the political regime that conceptualised the plan, and rewards them electorally. When it was discovered that the NREGA was not associated with the Congress in many areas, for instance, it was renamed the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. But the Congress must recognise that putting its stamp all over its favoured schemes could end up undermining their efficacy by alienating the next dispensation. Experience has also shown that non-Congress state governments do a better job with the Congress-led Centre's flagship programmes, as in the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana — a warning to parties against trying to "own" a government initiative, funded by public money.