- Bhagwat’s remark made no difference, vote transferability of Grand Alliance was good: Arun Jaitley
- As Shatrughan Sinha meets Nitish, Lalu, BJP leader compares him with dog chasing car
- Nepal asks India to ease supplies, calls protesters for talks
- N Srinivasan removal as ICC chairman: Chronicle of an end foretold
- Pawan Hans chopper crash: Body of one pilot found, wreckage traced
Modi has established the classic one-dominant-party model of competition in Gujarat. It comes very close to what the CPM had done in West Bengal till recently
How does one understand the outcome of the Gujarat assembly election? Is it a vote for development? Is it a personal victory for a leader slated to make it big in national politics? Or is it something more?
Narendra Modi's third victory in a row appears exaggerated in the light of the hype and drama surrounding it. To find out what distinguishes Modi and Gujarat, we need to first state what is not so special about this victory. Is this about the same leader winning elections in a row? Naveen Patnaik, Sheila Dikshit and Tarun Gogoi have all scored similar electoral wins so far. So, that is not something very special. Is it about bypassing anti-incumbency? In his speech after his third victory, Modi claimed to have ducked anti-incumbency. True enough, but that again is not something special to him or Gujarat. Between 2004 and 2012 (including Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat), a little over 50 per cent of state governments have survived and post-2008, 70 per cent of state governments have come back to power. So, Gujarat falls into a pattern rather than becoming a special "achievement".
Is it about voter satisfaction with governance? Surveys in Gujarat indicated that voters were generally satisfied with the state government. However, Lokniti-CSDS surveys earlier have shown that satisfaction levels for the Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh governments were higher than in Gujarat recently. Is it about the huge gap between two contenders? A 9 per cent vote gap between the BJP and the Congress, though impressive, is not something exceptional: Orissa, Assam, Delhi (in 1998 and 2003), Andhra Pradesh, etc have had similar impressive gaps between the winning party and the opposition. Even a lacklustre government in Maharashtra managed to return in 2009 with a vote gap of 7 per cent!
- India’s external sector has never been as strong as it has been since 1991-92
- An alarming rise in pollution levels underscores the urgent need for better regulation
- Government needs to double its overall support to farmers
- Bihar poll results do not mean Modi has to alter his international relations strategy
- Nepal-India relations: A step too far
- Bihar has been transformed from the graveyard of revolutions to a source of new hope