- Why Germanwings flight A320 might have crashed over the French Alps
- Indian Navy surveillance aircraft crashes in Goa; two officers missing
- Section 66A: 21 individuals whose petitions changed the system
- Government is willing to compromise on land bill: Venkaiah Naidu
- A little reminder: No one in House debated Section 66A, Congress brought it and BJP backed it
Akhilesh Yadav is steadily betraying expectations that propelled him to the UP chief ministership
Already facing criticism on all fronts over the suspension of IAS officer Durga Shakti Nagpal, the Uttar Pradesh government arrested Dalit writer Kanwal Bharti for criticising it on Facebook. Samajwadi Party leaders have even dragged Nagpal's family into the unseemly war of words. These events force attention to the ways in which UP politics is mired in the same old patterns. Just over a year after it won a decisive mandate in a notoriously fragmented state, weaning votes away from every competitor, the Samajwadi Party is rapidly wasting the goodwill it had gathered. Instead of inaugurating a new phase of governance, as Nitish Kumar did in Bihar to a considerable extent, Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav has ended up repeating all the errors of the past. The SP's single point agenda appears to be to foreground the state's communal cleavage.
Yet, for all its stated concern about preserving communal harmony, violence between communities has flared all over the state, be it in Mathura, Pratapgarh, Bareilly, Lucknow, Ghaziabad or Faizabad. The police has been undermined by the party's own workers, who interfere in administrative decisions and rub in their contempt for the law and order apparatus. Akhilesh Yadav has failed to rein in these elements, prompting unwelcome memories of previous SP governments. What's more, its advocacy of Muslim issues has been at the level of gesture alone. After making the sweeping manifesto promise that all terror cases against innocent Muslims would be withdrawn, for instance, it made no effort to present evidence and prove their innocence, and merely asked the courts to withdraw cases "in the interest of communal harmony". Not surprisingly, the government's shoddy defence has only elicited judicial reprimand.