These giveaways

After years of silence, it's good that sexist assumptions are now being aired and exposed

Women's safety and agency have long been considered unworthy of public debate in India. But now, it seems that everyone has something to say a story, an explanation, a theory. Abhijit Mukherjee's comment about "dented and painted" protesters was only the beginning. Since then, eminences from every political party and ideological bent have weighed in. Strange alliances seem to have sprouted between men who might disagree on everything else, but share perfect understanding on what a woman's place should be. The RSS chief would like a return to "Bharatiya" models of marriage, where a woman is a powerless drudge. The Jamaat-e-Islami thinks co-educational schools are the problem. Congress leader Botsa Satyanarayana suggested that the young woman who was gangraped had invited trouble by being out at night, and Asaram Bapu also thinks that she would have been spared if only she had appealed to the rapists, addressed them as "brother". Meanwhile, over in Puducherry, the education department has decided to tackle the problem by hiding schoolgirls in shapeless overcoats. In Rajasthan, the solicitous solution involved replacing skirts with pants/salwars.

The bad old tropes have all been aired, one by one blaming the victim, suggesting the problem lay in women's freedom, their stepping out of the supposed domestic cocoon (itself a site of injustice and violence, a fact scarcely acknowledged). Women's bodies have been held responsible for tempting men to hurt and violate them. Women's rights to their cities and public spaces, their right to spend their time as they choose and wear what they like rights that are automatically, thoughtlessly exercised by men are being questioned all over again.

But this open season for sexism is also welcome because each of these ridiculous claims is now being held up to the light. The young people moved to protest after the gangrape, and those who expressed their anger afterwards, made many intemperate points, including calls for hanging and castration, but none of them wanted a solution that impinged on women's freedoms, imposed curfews, denied them certain kinds of work or pleasure, swaddled them in protective layers. The focus was clearly on the men who did not respect the will of a fellow human being, and a society that makes excuses for such crime. This outpouring has shown up the difference between those who assume a woman's full and equal citizenship, and those who remain a part of the problem.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writer's alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of The Indian Express Group or its staff. Comments are automatically posted live; however, reserves the right to take it down at any time. We also reserve the right not to publish comments that are abusive, obscene, inflammatory, derogatory or defamatory.