To undo SC verdict, govt says it will change law, file review plea
- My government will not be vindictive: Narendra Modi on Robert Vadra
- Serious allegations against N Srinivasan in IPL spot-fixing probe report, keep him away from BCCI: Supreme Court
- Rahul Gandhi tells Narendra Modi: 'Ullu' banana band karo
- Karnataka: At least six burnt to death, 12 injured as bus catches fire
- IPL 7 Live Cricket Score: Malinga draws first blood for MI, castles Gambhir
A day after the Supreme Court ruled that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code would continue to make same-gender sex an offence punishable with a sentence up to life term, the government said Thursday that "urgent steps" would be taken to overturn the SC judgment.
Sources said the government is awaiting Attorney General Goolam E Vahanvati's return to New Delhi later this week and, after he gives his opinion, a review or curative petition is likely to be filed in the Supreme Court.
"We will have to change the law. If the Supreme Court has upheld that law, then we will certainly have to take firm steps. Change has to be made fast and any delay cannot take place. We will use all means available to make changes at the earliest," said Union Law Minister Kapil Sibal.
Asked to spell out the options available with the government, Sibal said, "One opinion could be to bring it to parliament at the earliest. The other opinion could be to approach the Supreme Court or take any other route. We will adopt the approach which will give us quick results."
During his arguments before the Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice G S Singhvi, Vahanvati had held that "the Government of India does not find any legal error in the judgment of the High Court and accepts the correctness of the same. This is also clear from the fact that it has not filed any appeal against the judgment of the High Court."
Stating that the HC had "read down" Section 377, Vahanvati had told the court that while Section 377 as such would remain, a proviso would have to be added to it to ensure that the same wouldn't apply to "any sexual activity between two consenting adults in private".
He had also pointed out that there were many aspects of modern day life which "by reason of technological, scientific and medical advances have already drastically altered the view as to what constitutes the order of nature... for instance, surrogacy, IVF, cloning, genetic modification of seeds, stem cell research, different methods of contraception, etc."