- Top General speaks on 2012 troop movement: "Def Secy summoned me late night, said highest seat of power was worried, troops must go back quickly"
- Telangana fallout: Governor accepts Reddy's resignation as Andhra Chief Minister
- Arvind Kejriwal writes to Narendra Modi on gas pricing, targest Mukesh Ambani again
- A day after Parliament passes Telangana bill, Hyderabad airport on red alert over letter threat
- Govt refuses security to IPL due to Lok Sabha polls, South Africa favourite to host 7th edition
After Indian immigrants Chandrasekhar and Anupama Vallabhaneni found themselves in Norwegian custody for allegedly maltreating their child, the drumbeat for "justice" has started again. External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid, however, has put paid to any suggestion that India might officially meddle: "This is an issue that relates not to the government. It relates to a private citizen and to the local law of that country," he said. This may only be stating the obvious, but Khurshid deserves praise for steering the ministry away from his predecessor's follies. In fact, this statement alone might suggest that the belated cabinet reshuffle was worth some of its hype.
Under S.M. Krishna, the external affairs ministry appeared content to bob along with the headlines. Last year, when Norway's Child Protection Services wanted to place the two young Bhattacharya children in foster care, Indian television channels, activists and political leaders made it a prime-time national drama — of the Norwegian state imposing its alien standards on our warm, imperfect parenting methods. Suddenly, the question of whether the Bhattacharyas abided by the law in the country of their choosing became an occasion for India to deplore cultural belittling abroad. And in response, the external affairs ministry sent a special envoy to Norway, warning them that these children were "neither orphaned nor stateless", spent months negotiating their return, only to be embarrassed when the private life of the Bhattacharyas turned out to be more complicated than they had bargained for. The Indian government ended up looking like an awkward participant in a family saga with shifting testimonies and volleys of recrimination. What's worse, at the time that the foreign ministry was passionately arguing that Norwegian norms were secondary to ours, it was busy presenting the opposing argument to Italy, over whether its marines could be tried for the killing of Indian fishermen in international waters. That bluster with Norway looked silly then. In retrospect, it looks even sillier.