UK civil servant says 26/11 not terror attack
- Bengal unit of Congress in a fix after it tweets out controversial Rajiv quote
- Thank You, PV Sindhu
- Those who consider India their country should treat cow as mother: Jharkhand CM
- India should be a lot bolder in meeting military needs of Afghanistan: Hamid Karzai
- Army seizes weapons after encounter on Myanmar border
A British civil servant is in the eye of a controversy for claiming that 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks were not an act of terrorism. Azad Ali, a Treasury official "got into trouble with his Treasury bosses after using his blog to deny that last November's Mumbai attacks were an act of terrorism," The Sunday Times reported.
Ali, who has used his internet blog to praise al-Qaeda leaders, sits on a Whitehall counter-terrorism panel that provides advice to Keir Starmer, the director of public prosecutions. He was investigated earlier this year over his controversial views on the Iraq war and was forced to deny that he sympathised with the killing of British troops.
Ali, an IT worker, has also defended Hizb ut-Tahrir, the radical group intent on creating an Islamic caliphate, and has condemned some moderate Muslims as "vultures feeding on the dead flesh of the Palestinians."
- PM's Balochistan policy: Gameplan, gambit or gamble?
- Lessons to learn from Rio Olympics
- Reminiscing after 70: What were the best decades of independent India?
- Inside Track: No party spirit
- There are systemic flaws and vulnerabilities. But India is on the right path
- Wrestlers lose face, and perhaps an Olympic medal, and NADA its credibility