UP changes norms for MLA, MLC funds
- Pakistan High Commission staffer asked to leave India after leak of sensitive defence documents
- Cyrus Mistry hits back at Tata Group with slew of allegations: Fraudulent transactions, unethical ways
- Tata Sons vs Cyrus: Sebi, govt keep watch, BSE seeks clarification
- Kashmir is a matter for India, Pakistan to sort out: British PM Theresa May
- It's unfortunate, because it has set a terrible precedent: Farhan Akhtar on Johar-MNS deal
The Department of Rural Development has changed the norms of the usage of legislators' local area devevolment funds (MLA/MLC funds), making it difficult for the members of assembly and council to get these funds allotted to such societies or trusts wherein they themselves or their family members are holding posts.
Till now, there were no explicit norms regarding the allotment of fund to any society or trust, which mentioned that relatives of legislators could not be a part of the society, said Rajiv Kumar, Principal Secretary of Rural Development. In the revised rules, the ambiguity has been removed and the definition of family members made clear, said Kumar.
Now, a legislator can propose various works under this scheme in a financial year, but a cap of Rs 25 lakh has been put on each of these proposals. As of now, Rs 1.5 crore is allotted to each member of legislative assembly and council. Kumar said that the guidelines for the utilisation of the funds are being prepared and will be ready within 10 days.
A legislator cannot recommend that the funds be allotted to any such society or trust where either the legislator or his or her family member is holding a post. Even if such society or trust has received funds under the scheme in the past, they cannot be recommended for further work. Family, as defined by the rules, includes legisator's father, mother, brother or sister, children, grand children and their spouse as well as the in-laws.
As an exception, such a trust or society working in the field of medical and health or education and is notified by the state government, where the legislator or family member is holding an honorary post without salary, can be given allocated funds, but the decision to provide "relaxation from contextual restriction" is with the Speaker of the house, who himself or through a committee formed by him, can take a decision on such cases.
- A letter like Cyrus Mistry’s could deepen the credibility crisis of Indian capitalism
- The transgender rights bill dilutes the private member’s bill passed by Rajya Sabha
- Diverse myths around the festival underpin Hinduism’s openness
- Polygamy and gender justice debate is more complicated than it is made out to be
- By brokering for MNS, Devendra Fadnavis has shown himself as a CM afraid of a bully
- Pak PM would do well to study the past before choosing Raheel Sharif’s successor