UP lawyers’ protest spills on Delhi roads


Over a 1,000 lawyers from courts across western Uttar Pradesh held a protest on Parliament Street on Wednesday demanding for a separate bench of the Allahabad High Court in the western part of the state.

Four days ago, lawyers from 17 western Uttar Pradesh districts had held a protest at the Hindon bridge in Ghaziabad, blocking traffic on NH-24 for several hours.

While one of the lawyers, Amit Jangala had also threatened to immolate himself, police officers said no such incident had taken place.

The lawyers came to Delhi from across Uttar Pradesh in more than 30 buses and said the protest would intensify if their demands were not met.

"The last time we protested in Ghaziabad. On this occasion, we moved the protest to Delhi as it is the central government which has to take a decision in this regard. But the Centre has paid no heed to our demand so far," Amit Singhal, a lawyer from Meerut, said.

Lawyers said since all cases from the courts in western Uttar Pradesh such as Meerut, Ghaziabad and Bulandshahar go to Allahabad, it has an adverse impact on both advocates and litigants. "Litigants have to travel all the way to Allahabad. Very often, they choose not to appeal because of the expense and the inconvenience involved. Further, since the High Court is far away, it affects professional growth of lawyers in these districts," Pankaj Gupta from Ghaziabad court said.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus