UPA’s quota quandary
- LIVE: Lok Sabha passes Telangana Bill, Jagan calls for bandh across Andhra Pradesh
- Your ministers used to throw dust, now they're using pepper spray to fool people: Modi to Cong
- Rajiv Gandhi's killers get relief, Supreme Court commutes death penalty to life
- Seven Naxals killed in police encounter in Gadchiroli
- Interim Budget 2014: Economy headache for next government
Bowing to the pressure tactics of BSP supremo Mayawati, the UPA government has set the ball rolling for a provision for reservation for SC/ST employees in promotions. However, getting the Constitution (117th Amendment) Bill, 2012 passed in both Houses of Parliament would only be the beginning of the process to undo the April 27 decision of the Supreme Court through which it had set aside reservation in promotions provided by the previous Mayawati-led government in Uttar Pradesh on the ground that the same did not fulfil the criteria laid down by the apex court in N Nagaraj versus Union of India.
Since while quashing the notification, the court had observed that no exercise was undertaken to collect quantifiable data regarding inadequacy of SC/ST employees in senior government jobs, it would be interesting to see what kind of data the UPA government comes up with to support the amendment.
For there is every likelihood that the Constitution amendment would be challenged by those opposing the provision.
In Nagaraj, a five-judge SC Bench had categorically ruled that before providing for reservations "the concerned State will have to show in each case the existence of the compelling reasons, namely, backwardness, inadequacy of representation and overall administrative efficiency".
The Bench had also ruled that while the State "is not bound to make reservation for SC/ST in matter of promotions", in case it wanted to make such provision, it "has to collect quantifiable data showing backwardness of the class and inadequacy of representation of that class in public employment".
In an earlier judgment, this one by a nine-judge Bench, in the Indra Sawhney case, the court had ruled that while the SC/STs could be given reservation while entering in government jobs, the concept of quota in promotions was not justified. The 77th amendment to the Constitution was done to negate the impact of Indra Sawhney.
- ‘Job target now hinges on manufacturing’
- Murder of Sahu siblings: Court says convict to be in jail for ‘the rest of his life’
- Inauguration drama: Amid BJP’s boos and barbs, mayor stars in second act
- Police’s grievance cell flooded with complaints from cops, 15 in past year
- NDA lodges FIR after cadet goes missing, he returns to tell cops he missed family
- Allow us to install gates at Narmada dam, you take credit: Modi to Centre