US court orders resentencing for Indian origin doctor in bombing case
- Sonia Gandhi attacks BJP ideology, says Country is at crossroads
- Rahul mocks Modi, says his Gujarat development model is a toffee model
- Under fire over Baru's revelation, Congress retorts by calling 'Vajpayee the weakest PM India ever had'
- Narendra Modi, party not separate, no infighting: BJP on Joshi's remarks
- Priyanka Gandhi denies report on fighting polls against Modi
A doctor sentenced to life in prison for a 2009 bombing that nearly killed the head of the Arkansas state medical board should be resentenced on some convictions, a federal appeals court ruled.
A jury convicted Randeep Mann, an Indian-born naturalized US citizen, in 2010 of conspiring to use a weapon of mass destruction and other charges.
The February 4, 2009, bomb attack took away Dr Trent Pierce's sense of smell and left him blind in one eye and deaf in one ear.
Mann's attorneys appealed his convictions and sentences, arguing there wasn't enough evidence to convict him.
The 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals said yesterday that Mann shouldn't have received a sentencing enhancement based on allegations that he ordered the assault of an inmate.
The panel said the allegation was never brought up in court and was improperly referenced in a pre-sentencing report.
"The only reference in the record to Mann ordering the assault of a federal inmate is contained in a bench conference that occurred at trial between the district judge and the attorneys," the appeals court opinion said.
The court affirmed the weapon of mass destruction conviction, but ordered that one of Mann's two machine gun convictions be tossed out, finding they amounted to double jeopardy. Mann was convicted of both possessing an unregistered machine gun and possessing a machine gun.
Prosecutors said Mann, 54, was responsible for a bomb left outside Pierce's home in West Memphis, Arkansas, after the board suspended Mann's license following the overdose deaths of some of his patients.
Pierce has said he believes the attack was revenge for revoking Mann's license to prescribe narcotics.
"Mann had a long history of investigations by the Board, and Dr Pierce testified that he had been particularly vocal about his belief that Mann was providing improper care to his patients," the appeals court opinion said.