US court rejects demand for default judgement against Sonia Gandhi
- Mad rush, chaos as Arvind Kejriwal takes local train to woo 'aam aadmi' in Mumbai
- SC defers hearing on Sahara's plea on releasing Subrata Roy
- IAF aircraft on standby for missing Malaysian Airlines search ops
- Presidential delay in mercy petitions: SC won't reconsider verdict
- Lalu loyalist-turned rebel Ram Kripal Yadav joins BJP
Gandhi's Counsel Ravi Batra said in an emailed statement to PTI that, contrary to claims by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), the Congress president was not served summons during her visit to the city for medical purposes in September.
Batra said he has informed the federal judge that the New York court lacks personal and subject matter jurisdiction in the case and SFJ has been indulging in "improper judge and venue shopping."
SFJ had on Tuesday filed a service-affidavit with the US District Court in the Eastern District of New York claiming that an "alternate" service was served on Gandhi on September 9 through the receptionist, nurse supervisor and security employees at the Sloan-Kettering Memorial Hospital.
SFJ had also requested for a mandatory default judgement to be issued against Gandhi, a demand that was rejected by the presiding judge.
Batra said Judge Cogan of the district court has granted SFJ's counsel four weeks to amend the complaint, given the "legal infirmities" in their case.
Batra said he would move the court to dismiss the lawsuit and seek an injunction against the group.
"We will then move to dismiss the case with finality, seek an anti-suit injunction against SFJ, and other appropriate relief to remedy provable bad faith and/or vexations litigation by plaintiff.
Earlier this week Batra had said that SFJ indulged in an "improper judge-and-venue-shopping" by filing lawsuits against Congress party and its leaders, including Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Gandhi, Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Kamal Nath in various federal courts in the US.
Batra had said Gandhi has "not been served with process" in the anti-Sikh riots case.
Sikhs for Justice has filed cases against the Congress party and its leaders for shielding and protecting party leaders allegedly involved in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots in Delhi.