US defends Headley verdict, rules out his extradition to India

Terming the sentencing of LeT terrorist David Headley as a "positive example" of India-US counter-terrorism cooperation, US virtually ruled out extradition and defended the verdict saying justice has been served as promised.

"We promised that justice would be served, that justice is being served in this case," State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland told reporters, when asked about India's reservations over the court ruling.

India has expressed disappointment over the 35-year jail term awarded to the Pakistani-American by a Chicago court, arguing that given the nature of his crime, a longer sentence or death penalty was required.

"David Headley, a key conspirator in the Mumbai terrorist attacks, has been brought to justice in the United States. He will serve 35 years in prison for his role in these heinous acts that claimed the lives of 166 people, including six Americans," she said.

Asked specifically about India's insistence on Headley's extradition, Nuland said, "He's been tried, convicted, and will serve in the United States." "Not only did he stand trial, face conviction, now have to serve 35 years. But in the context of this prosecution, Mr Headley provided information of substantial value in our efforts against terrorism, including testifying against co-conspirator Mr well as submitting to questions from Indian law enforcement and working with US investigators," she said.

"So from our perspective, justice was served, and this is a very positive example of US-Indian collaboration in the counter-terrorism realm," Nuland said.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus