US gun lobby says firm ‘no’ to gun control

Apparently unmoved by a national outcry over the Sandy Hook school massacre, the most powerful gun lobby in US has ruled out backing new proposed restraints on firearms in the country and instead has pushed for placing armed guards in schools.

Terming moves by President Barack Obama and sections of US Congress to frame strict new laws to control guns as "phony", Wayne LaPierre, executive vice-president of the National Rifle Association (NRA), Sunday said planned legislation to outlaw military-style assault weapons would not work.

He repeated the NRA's call to place armed guards in schools and argued that prosecuting criminals and fixing the mental health system, rather than gun control, were the solutions to America's mass shooting epidemic.

A disturbed 20-year-old Adam Lanza on December 14 barged into Sandy Hook and killed 20 children and six adults with a military-style assault rifle before taking his own life. The bloodshed triggred a national debate on gun laws.

Echoing support for gun control, Democratic Senator Diane Feinstein has pledged to table a bill on January 3 that would ban at least 100 military-style semi-automatic assault weapons, and would curb the transfer, importation and the possession of such arms.

In a point blank "NO" to the proposed law, LaPierre told NBC, "I think that is a phony piece of legislation, and I do not believe it will pass for this reason. It is all built on lies that have been found out. We don't think it works and we're not going to support it."

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus