- CBI sought part RTI exemption, Govt gave it full
- Screen Awards: Milkha, Ram-Leela and Madras Cafe dominate
- DGCA seeks fresh public objections after clearing AirAsia for take-off
- Delhi: 51-year-old Danish national alleges gangrape, 15 detained for questioning
- I wonder if I will be able to ever reunite with my husband, my kids. I miss them: Devyani
India will need to track US attempts to appease Rawalpindi on the way out
In announcing a schedule for ending America's longest foreign war ever in Afghanistan by 2014, US President Barack Obama has found a balance between competing imperatives. In 2009, Obama had declared that America's occupation of Afghanistan was "a war of necessity" in contrast to the disastrous "war of choice in Iraq". He ordered a massive surge in American military presence to launch a counter-insurgency campaign to help Afghanistan secure itself. Since then, Obama appears to have convinced himself that the counter-insurgency campaign is unlikely to work and shifted focus to the more limited objective of counter-terrorism — defeating the al-Qaeda and its affiliates.
The liberal opinion at home, especially in his own Democratic Party, has been demanding a rapid military retreat from Afghanistan, and much of it within this year itself. The military leaders, on the other hand, insist that a precipitous withdrawal would undo most of the gains made since the US intervened in Afghanistan at the end of 2001. They have pressed Obama to leave a sizeable force until the very end of 2014, to assist the Afghan armed forces to stand up on their own and compel the Taliban to accept reasonable terms of reconciliation.
- Live: Kejriwal does a U turn, urges people to come in largeÂ numbers
- Women competent enough, they need opportunities, saysÂ Rahul
- â€˜Modi has a majoritarian, authoritarian attitudeâ€¦ such a policy and style of govt would be a disaster for thisÂ countryâ€™
- â€˜Narmada water not reaching farmers for want of minor canalsâ€™ | The Indian Express