Victory for protesters as HC slams Delhi Police over anti-gangrape crackdown, hints fundamental rights violation

Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court today observed that Section 144 of CrPC under which prohibitory orders can be clamped will lose its "sanctity" if it is invoked by authorities "just like that" since there are rights to movement and speech and expression.

With this observation, the court reserved its verdict on a plea challenging imposition of prohibitory orders in and around India Gate during the recent protests against the gangrape in Delhi of a 23-year-old girl.

"There are rights to movement and speech and expression, it (section 144 of the CrPC) cannot be used just like that...otherwise it would lead to loss of the sanctity," a bench of Chief Justice D Murugesan and Justice V K Jain said.

The observations came during hearing of a PIL filed by Delhi-based advocate Anand K Mishra, who alleged that the prohibitory order was imposed in an "arbitrary" manner and without following the procedures enshrined under the CrPC.

Appearing for Delhi police, Additional Solicitor General Siddharth Luthra opposed the plea saying the guidelines for imposition of prohibitory orders under section 144 of CrPC (which deals with power to issue order in urgent cases of nuisance or apprehended danger) cannot be framed as all cases are "distinguishable" and contain different facts.

A senior lawyer, appearing for advocate Mishra, said: "The whole Capital was traumatised over the gangrape and thousands of girl students and others, who do not feel safe, came to join the social movement. It was not a political movement. The section (144) cannot be used to curtail the constitutional rights."

He also cited various apex court judgements including the verdict on the Ramlila Maidan incident involving Baba Ramdev and his supporters and sought framing of guidelines on the issue.

"As far as this notification (on invoking sec-144 in and around India Gate) is concerned, if that is not in place now then what is the purpose of the petition," Justice Murugesan said.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus