Where there's smoke
- HSBC Indian list just doubled to 1195 names. Balance: Rs 25420 cr
- Manjhi expelled, Nitish stakes claim to form govt in Bihar
- Hanging of Afzal Guru was 'wrong' & 'badly' handled, says Shashi Tharoor
- Have given it my all, not nervous about result: Kiran Bedi
- Japanese girl allegedly raped by tourist guide in Jaipur
The controversy over anti-smoking warnings resurfaces with the 'Blue Jasmine' kerfuffle.
Woody Allen films tend to have plenty of distractions, ranging from the neurotic tics of his characters to the propensity of the man himself to pop up onscreen. But the auteur has taken exception to an Indian law that mandates the screening of a health ministry short depicting — graphically — the horrors of smoking before a film that contains smoking scenes, deeming such warnings to be far too distracting. Blue Jasmine, hailed as one of Allen's best, will therefore not be released in Indian theatres.
Allen would probably have dismissed — while no doubt blowing out curls of smoke — the very notion of releasing his film here had the 2005 rules, banning smoking scenes in new films, still been in effect. The Delhi High Court struck down the ban in 2009, but the Centre appealed. Finally, it introduced new rules in September last year, which were contested by UTV on the basis that displaying a warning each time the titular Heroine lit up would distract from the film.