Why impose Sec 144 during peaceful protest: Court
- GST Bill in Rajya Sabha this week, Jaitley to discuss amendments with state finance ministers
- Narsingh Yadav fails dope test, Rio 2016 Olympics participation under threat
- AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan arrested for threatening a woman
- Kin of missing AN-32 passengers, crew: Across the country, they wait for word, hoping and praying
- Kashmir unrest: Of 317 with pellet injuries in action by CRPF, over 50% have been hit in eye
A city court on Saturday asked the police to explain the reasons for imposing prohibitory orders under Section 144 CrPC during protests led by India Against Corruption against the coal block allocation scam.
Observing that "taking out a peaceful protest march near the PM's residence is a fundamental right of every citizen", Metropolitan Magistrate Jay Thareja asked police to explain why they had imposed prohibitory orders under Section 144 "when there was no imminent threat of violence by the protesters".
The court raised the questions during the hearing in an application for discharge filed by IAC leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan, Manish Sisodia and 23 others who are facing charges of unlawful assembly, destruction of public property, intimidating and obstructing a public servant and rioting during the protest march on August 26 last year.
- Kashmir unrest: A to-do list for PM Modi
- Not too late to reverse an ugliness spreading in the name of our sacred cows
- Arvind Kejriwal is uncomfortable with anyone with a mind of his own
- Not just the Arunachal switch but the choice of Sheila Dikshit for the UP are warnings to the BJP
- Gujarat unrest shows while Dalit lives have improved, conflict has increased
- Zakir Naik is ‘protected’ as an Indian citizen but he considers himself a Muslim first