- Sheena Bora murder case: Third accused Sanjeev Khanna confesses to police
- 3 civilians dead, nearly a dozen injured in Pakistan firing in J&K
- Nitish Kumar's Arvind Kejriwal symbolism looks good but unease in allies RJD, Congress
- OROP row: Veterans reject govt offer, boycott 1965 golden jubilee celebrations
- Patidar protest: HC directs CID to investigate custodial death of Patel youth
Even as the opposition ranks remain divided over the best way to corner the UPA government on FDI in retail, the Sangh Parivar has already anticipated fireworks in Parliament's winter session. While Panchjanya has carried an editorial highlighting the "difficult situation" the government finds itself in on this issue, the Organiser has devoted its cover story to it. The editorial in Panchjanya claims the government was engaged in "bargaining" with the SP and the BSP, and apprehended that even UPA partner DMK's silence on FDI in retail was a kind of "bargaining tactic".
The Organiser report, however, appears confident that "FDI in retail grinds the government to a halt" and hoped that the "stormy winter session will dwarf Congress grandstanding". The cover story also suggests the opposition's "focus will shift to policymaking and economic reforms" during the winter session, despite the fact that the issue of alleged irregularities in coal block allocations washed out the last session.
While she continues to focus less on her governance in West Bengal and threatens to force the UPA at the Centre to a floor test, it's the Sangh Parivar that has come to TMC chief Mamata Banerjee's defence against the criticism she has faced over police firing in her state recently.
The editorial in the Organiser describes the "overdrive" of the CPM and the media "to damn Mamata" over the issue as "unjustified tirade" and appeals to everyone to "give her time, if not support" because Banerjee has "inherited an empty coffer, a corroded industry, a society that had been suppressed by the Red cadre terror and a system completely infiltrated by communist loyalists, fellow-travellers and sympathisers". Extending its claim of communist infiltration to the deepest corners of government, the editorial loudly thinks that "it would not be surprising if it turns out that the police fired on the villagers at Nadia and elsewhere in the state only to besmirch her governance".