Woman accuses DSP, inspector of molestation; HC issues notices
- RJD splits as 13 MLAs say they don't support Lalu Prasad; later 6 backtrack
- Govt has decided to drop anti-piracy charges against Italian marines, Centre tells SC
- Rahul slams Modi on migrant issue, says BJP playing divisive politics
- Rajiv Gandhi assassination case: SC to hear Centre's plea on restraining TN govt from releasing convicts
- Leopard on the loose in Meerut, officials order closure of schools and colleges
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notices to the Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) and an Inspector with Mohali police for allegedly "molesting, physically assaulting and abusing" a woman in police custody.
Not only this, the two police officers have been issued notices by the High Court on an application moved by the counsel of the "victim" who have alleged that they (counsel) are being "harassed" for contesting the case of the said woman.
Notices have also been issued to the Punjab Director General of Police and Mohali Senior Superintendent of Police on a petition filed by one Yadwinder Singh, brother of Neena Sharma, the "victim".
The petitioner has approached the High Court seeking directions to the Mohali DGP to immediately suspend Mohali DSP Rajinder Singh Sohal and the Inspector who allegedly molested the woman and are harassing her counsel to withdraw the case filed in the High Court.
A proclaimed offender and accused of cheating in several cases, Neena was apprehended by the Mohali police in September. On the night of September 25, as alleged by Neena's brother, the DSP and Inspector came to police station Matour, Mohali, and "molested, assaulted and abused" her.
Yadwinder had approached the High Court a fortnight back and sought protection of his sister. Also, he had demanded that she be given medical help as she is a chronic patient of diabetes, hypertension and also suffering from other diseases.
Even the doctors recommended that she be injected insulin thrice a day. A week after the High Court issued notices, her counsel approached the High Court alleging "harassment".
Neena's counsel, advocates Shelly Sharma and Gurmeet Singh, alleged that they had started receiving calls that they (lawyers) would be implicated in false cases by the Mohali police for contesting her case.
The petitioners have contended that if the Mohali police is in possession of any "incriminating evidence" against them (lawyers), the police should produce it before the High Court before taking any action.
- 4 more bodies found on Arunachal border, curfew in Assam town
- ‘Polls have come in the way of new norms for tech institutes’
- Food security Act also covers foreign nationals, refugees, says Law Ministry
- Lokayukta meets Bhardwaj over Bill
- Days before school admissions start, HC order on RTE creates confusion
- NGO seeks funds to train HIV+ patients