Wrong to say US prefers killing terrorists than capturing: Obama adviser
- SC allows Italian marine Girone to fly home after Centre backs plea on humanitarian grounds
- India's states have to help navigate country's growth: Modi tells Journal
- 'Under PM Modi, decision making has replaced policy paralysis witnessed during UPA regime'
- Economy’s green shoots yet to strike roots: Private investment still frozen
- Amit Shah nuances 'Congress-mukt Bharat': Freedom from Congress system
A top counter-terrorism adviser to the US President has strongly refuted allegations that Obama Administration prefers killing terrorists rather than capturing them.
"The United States has acknowledged that it uses lethal force, when appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to prevent terrorist attacks on the United States and to save American lives, but I reject any suggestion that the Administration somehow prefers killing terrorists to capturing them," said John Brennan, the top counter terrorism adviser to the US President.
Brennan said this in a written submission of answers to questions asked by members of the Senate Intelligence Committee as part of his confirmation process for the post of CIA Director, the hearing for which was held last week.
"Our unqualified preference is to capture an individual rather than use lethal force, in part because we recognise that one of the best sources of intelligence comes from the interrogation of captured terrorists.
We only undertake lethal force when we determine that capture is not feasible," he said yesterday.
Brennan said while some terrorism suspects have refused to provide information in the criminal justice system, so have many held in military custody.
The top White House counter terrorism official said that the US does not believe that its authority to use military force against AL-QED and associated forces as being limited to "hot" battlefields like Afghanistan. "Al-Qaeda and its associates have in the recent past directed several attacks against us from countries other than Afghanistan.
"The Government has a responsibility to protect its citizens from these attacks, and, thus, as the Attorney General has noted, "neither Congress nor our federal courts has limited the geographic scope of our ability to use force to the current conflict in Afghanistan," he said.
"This does not mean, however, that we use military force whenever or wherever we want. International legal principles, such as respect for another nation's sovereignty, constrain our ability to act unilaterally.
- Muslims and RSS cannot afford to go on hating
- After the initial euphoria, Modi government has created widespread despondency
- Fixing the learning deficit requires a lot more than right kind of tracking technology
- The problem begins with the way we define “urban” and “rural”
- Modi govt’s backward-looking instincts pulls down its forward-looking mission
- Judge-population ratio is not the apt parameter to determine judiciary’s strength